• Resources
  • Blog
  • Journalists
  • Webcasts
  • Français
  • Log in  
    • Online Member Centre
    • Cision Communications Cloud®
    • Cision PR Edition
    • CisionPoint
    • MediaSource Monitoring/Evaluation
    • Visible Intelligence
    • FastFinder
    • my CNW
    • CNW Access
  • Sign Up
  • Send a Release
  • News
  • Products
  • Contact

Log in

Online Member Centre


Cision Communications Cloud®


Cision PR Edition


CisionPoint


MediaSource Monitoring/Evaluation


Visible Intelligence


FastFinder


My CNW


CNW Access


Sign Up


Search

Advanced Search

CNW

Spectrum Set Aside Won't Benefit Consumers


News provided by

Montreal Economic Institute

Oct 05, 2017, 11:00 ET

Share this article


MONTREAL, Oct. 5, 2017 /CNW Telbec/ - A decade after we first debated the appropriateness of setting spectrum aside to foster the emergence of new wireless players, it seems the federal government hasn't learned anything about the perverse effects of such a policy, says a telecom policy analyst at the Montreal Economic Institute.

The consultations on the framework of the upcoming 600-MHz auction (likely to take place in 2019) ended earlier this week. Ottawa has once again proposed to reserve 40% of available licences for smaller players. In effect, this means that Shaw's Freedom Mobile, Videotron, SaskTel, and Eastlink will not have to bid against the Big Three—Bell, Rogers, and TELUS—for these licences and will therefore be able to acquire them at a cheaper price.

Martin Masse, coauthor of a yearly research paper on the state of competition in Canada's telecommunications industry, notes that "experience has shown that such measures essentially constitute public subsidies that are either lost to weak new entrants that consistently fail, or wasted on established regional players that would have had the means to bid for the full value of the spectrum."

The biggest beneficiaries of the federal government's interventionist rules have been the shareholders of some of these companies which arbitraged their government-subsidized spectrum acquisition to secure a windfall. The federal government's rules have also delayed the use—or the more efficient use—of spectrum frequencies that were wasted on the failed companies or were simply unused by the license holders.

Mr. Masse contends that inefficient usage of spectrum has been one of the most damaging unintended consequences of this flawed policy. It made spectrum scarcer and more expensive, which is the exact opposite of the government's stated intention of adopting policies that are conducive to lower consumer prices.

"Why have an auction if you're going to rig the rules in order to ensure a specific outcome?" asks Michel Kelly-Gagnon, President and CEO of the MEI. "Open, competitive auctions are supposed to lead to a more optimal allocation of resources than arbitrary decisions by politicians and bureaucrats. The proposed set aside defeats that purpose. If the government really believes we need more competition in the wireless sector, it should let it happen, plain and simple."

* * *

The Montreal Economic Institute is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit research and educational organization. Through its studies and its conferences, the MEI stimulates debate on public policies in Quebec and across Canada by proposing wealth-creating reforms based on market mechanisms.

SOURCE Montreal Economic Institute

For further information: Interview requests: Karl-Javid Lalonde-Dhanji, Analyst and Coordinator, Current Affairs, MEI, Tel.: 514-273-0969, ext. 2224, Cell.: 514-824-8948, Email: klalonde@iedm.org

Related Links

http://www.iedm.org

Organization Profile

Montreal Economic Institute

Also from this source:

  • Is Ontario the new public finance dunce?
  • The Comeau decision: 37 million Canadians are the big losers
  • Season 4 of the Free Markets Series now available online

You just read:

Spectrum Set Aside Won't Benefit Consumers

News provided by

Montreal Economic Institute

Oct 05, 2017, 11:00 ET

Share this article

Oct 16, 2017, 18:36 ET

Preview: Ending supply management: An opportunity for Canada

Oct 03, 2017, 07:31 ET

Preview: The boreal caribou preservation plan could cost over $740 million a year

  • Send a Release
  • FR
    • Contact Us

      +1-877-269-7890
      Phone 8AM - 10PM ET

  • Send a Release
  • Sign Up
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Journalists
  • Webcasts

        Share this article

        • Contact Cision
        • 877-269-7890
          from 8 AM - 10 PM ET
        • Contact Us
          • Become a Client
          • Request a Demo
          • Editorial Bureaus
          • Partnerships
          • General Inquiries
          • Media Enquiries
          • Worldwide Offices
        •  
        • Products
        • Cision Communications Cloud®
        • Distribution
        • Monitoring and Analytics
        • Targeting
        • Investor Relations
        • Multimedia Services
        • About
        • About Cision Canada
        • About Cision
        • Media Partners
        • Careers
        • My Services
        • All News Releases
        • Online Member Centre
        • Cision Communications Cloud®
        • Cision PR Edition
        • CisionPoint
        • MediaSource Monitoring/Evaluation
        • Visible Intelligence
        • FastFinder
        • my CNW
        • CNW Access
        My Services
        • All News Releases
        • Online Member Centre
        • Cision Communications Cloud®
        • Cision PR Edition
        • CisionPoint
        • MediaSource Monitoring/Evaluation
        • Visible Intelligence
        • FastFinder
        • my CNW
        • CNW Access
        877-269-7890
        from 8 AM - 10 PM ET
        • Terms of Use
        • Information Security Policy
        • Site Map
        Copyright © 2018 CNW Group Ltd. All rights reserved. A Cision company.