PERTH, Western Australia, April 29, 2013 /CNW/ - Aurora Oil & Gas Ltd ("Aurora") (ASX:AUTTSX:AEF) is pleased to provide an update on corporate activities and the progress of the development program of its Eagle Ford assets in the Sugarkane Field in South Texas, in accordance with ASX listing rules.
On a quarter-on-quarter basis Aurora is pleased to report a:
Activities during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 have led to the following corporate, operational and production highlights:
________________________________
1 Calculation includes allowance for 2012 production
Sugarkane Field - Eagle Ford Shale
Aurora's primary asset is its interest in the Sugarkane Field in South Texas, which is located in the core area of the Eagle Ford shale. Aurora participates in approximately 79,700 highly contiguous gross acres that make up the field. The Operator of 77,100 gross acres is Marathon Oil EF LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marathon Oil Corporation (NYSE: MRO) ("Marathon") and Aurora is the largest non-operating working interest partner in this area. In addition Aurora has 100% working interest and is Operator of two further areas within the Sugarkane Field. Aurora's total acreage position in the Sugarkane Field is shown in the map above.
At the end of the reporting period, Aurora had a net position of approximately 21,800 acres within four adjacent Areas of Mutual Interest ("AMIs") and two operated areas in the Sugarkane Field. The varying levels of participation are outlined in the table below and the AMIs are shown on the map above.
AMI | Working Interest | Gross Acreage | Net Acreage |
Sugarloaf | 28.0% | 24,300 | 6,700 |
Longhorn | 31.9% | 28,100 | 9,000 |
Ipanema | 36.4% | 4,500 | 1,600 |
Excelsior | 9.1% | 20,200 | 1,800 |
Operated acreage | 100% | 2,700 | 2,700 |
Total | 79,700* | 21,800* |
*Totals may not sum due to rounding |
Operations
There were between 5 and 9 rigs drilling at any one time on Aurora's non-operated Sugarkane acreage during the reporting quarter. A total of 36 gross (8.9 net) wells were spudded and 36 gross (8.0 net) wells were put on production in this period. The following table provides an activity status within the non-operated Sugarkane field as at March 31, 2013.
Sugarloaf | Longhorn | Ipanema | Excelsior | Total | |
Wells | |||||
Producing | 66 | 112 | 7 | 67 | 252 |
Stimulation Underway | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Awaiting Stimulation | 3 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
Drilling or Rigging up | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
Total* | 70 | 132 | 7 | 69 | 278 |
* Not including 4 farmout wells subject to payback provisions. |
In addition, a variety of well intervention operations have taken place across a number of wells in which Aurora has an interest. Operations carried out included tubing change outs and repairs as well as gas lift and pump installations.
As anticipated the majority of drilling activity during Q1 2013 within the non-operated Sugarkane field utilised multiple wells 'pads', where 2 - 5 wells are drilled from the same surface location. This allows cost and efficiency savings by sharing infrastructure and avoiding lengthy rig and fracture stimulation equipment moves. Further efficiencies are expected with several pads undergoing batch drilling, whereby the vertical surface hole section of wells at a particular pad location are all drilled first, then all of the horizontal sections are drilled thereafter. This batch approach allows equipment and operations to be configured for a particular phase of the well drilling and then repeatedly used in that mode, again resulting in efficiency gains.
During the reporting quarter, Aurora acquired a 100% working interest in approximately 2,700 net acres near or adjacent to the existing Sugarkane holdings and is operator of this position. The transaction closed March 29, 2013 and no activities will therefore be captured in this report. There are 11 producing wells on the acreage which are not included in the above summary. Details of activities carried out by Aurora in this new area will be reported on going forward and the Company anticipates commencement of drilling in mid-2013.
2013 Guidance
At the end of the reporting quarter Aurora released its 2013 guidance and an update on anticipated activity levels for 2013. This update was based on further evolution of the non-operated drilling schedule and plans for the newly acquired operated Sugarkane acreage. Aurora advised that it:-
Down spacing Pilot Program Update
Subsequent to the reporting quarter Aurora released preliminary results from the downspacing pilot program underway within the Sugarkane field. A summary of these preliminary results is:
Production
During the reporting period, a total of 36 new gross (8.0 net) wells were brought on production. For the majority of the period there were between 1 and 3 frac crews active on Aurora's Sugarkane acreage. The following table provides details of the Aurora production during Q1 2013 which comprised of 80% liquids on a boe basis.
Qtr 1 Prod |
Aurora Gross (WI) | Aurora Net (NRI) | ||||||||
Oil (bbls) |
Cond (bbls) |
Gas (mscf) |
NGL (bbls) |
BOE* (bbls) |
Oil (bbls) |
Cond (bbls) |
Gas (mscf) |
NGL (bbls) |
BOE* (bbls) |
|
Jan | 196,023 | 180,062 | 670,969 | 84,667 | 572,580 | 144,292 | 132,953 | 495,820 | 62,539 | 422,421 |
Feb | 181,387 | 151,308 | 623,794 | 85,491 | 522,152 | 133,485 | 111,638 | 460,914 | 63,138 | 385,080 |
Mar | 197,236 | 168,654 | 709,293 | 100,137 | 584,243 | 145,282 | 124,523 | 524,260 | 73,989 | 431,171 |
Total | 574,646 | 500,024 | 2,004,056 | 270,295 | 1,678,974 | 423,059 | 369,114 | 1,480,994 | 199,666 | 1,238,671 |
Average Daily Rate |
6,385 | 5,556 | 22,267 | 3,003 | 18,655 | 4,701 | 4,101 | 16,455 | 2,219 | 13,763 |
Note totals may not sum due to rounding *The oil equivalent barrels per day production rate has been calculated on a 6:1 ratio of gas to oil. |
The graph at the top shows the quarterly production profile since the beginning of 2012. The figures shown at the base of each production bar show the incremental net wells added during that period. As indicated in the Company's 2013 guidance, Aurora anticipates activities to be weighted to the second half of the year and its production growth profile will reflect this bias.
Year end 2012 reserves update
The following reserve estimates were prepared by the Houston based team of Ryder Scott Company, L.P. in accordance with the standards contained in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook with the reserve definitions contained in the Canadian National Instrument 51-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Oil & Gas Activities.
Aurora Gross Reserves (before royalty interests) |
Aurora Net Reserves (after royalty interests) |
|||||||
L/M Oil (mbbls) | NGL and Cond (mbbls) |
Natural Gas (mmscf) |
BOE (mbbls) |
L/M Oil (mbbls) | NGL and Cond (mbbls) |
Natural Gas (mmscf) | BOE (mbbls) |
|
Proved Developed Producing | 7,752 | 8,778 | 30,133 | 21,552 | 5,710 | 6,490 | 22,258 | 15,909 |
Proved Undeveloped | 23,694 | 30,656 | 112,722 | 73,137 | 17,436 | 22,653 | 83,263 | 53,967 |
Total Proved (1P) | 31,446 | 39,433 | 142,855 | 94,688 | 23,146 | 29,143 | 105,522 | 69,876 |
Probable | 1,433 | 3,595 | 18,915 | 8,181 | 1,069 | 2,677 | 14,091 | 6,094 |
Proved + Probable (2P) | 32,879 | 43,028 | 161,769 | 102,869 | 24,215 | 31,820 | 119,612 | 75,970 |
Possible | 2,436 | 36,702 | 154,182 | 64,835 | 1,793 | 27,166 | 114,285 | 48,006 |
Proved + Probable + Possible (3P)2 | 35,315 | 79,731 | 315,952 | 167,705 | 26,008 | 58,986 | 233,897 | 123,976 |
_________________________ | |||||
2 Possible reserves are those reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability that the quantities actually recovered will be equal or exceed the sum of the proved plus probable plus possible reserves. |
The updated reserve estimate captured material increases in all categories but in particular the PDP reserves which increased by 360% and 1P reserves which increased by 23% compared to the previous year allowing for 2012 production. For further detail please refer to the company announcement made on January 31, 2013.
Regional Eagle Ford Shale activity
The Eagle Ford shale is recognised by the industry as the one of the premier shale plays in the US. High liquids content, strong well performance (particularly in the core of the trend) and significant regional infrastructure drive attractive economics.
As a result activity levels have remained high, with 226 rigs reportedly currently operating on the trend. Companies participating in the Eagle Ford continue to announce a range of results that conform to a broad economic trend but with superior economics through Live Oak, Karnes and DeWitt counties. Significant levels of corporate activity also continue with resultant consolidation.
New infrastructure projects have been announced looking to capture both mid and downstream opportunities. These include oil and gas pipelines, refinery upgrades to process light oils, condensate and NGLs.
Quarterly Revenue and Capital Expenditure
Aurora's revenue from oil and gas sales for the first quarter of 2013 totalled US$128 million (US$93 million after royalties).
Total capital expenditure including accruals for the quarter totalled US$222 million representing development undertaken at the Sugarkane field during the period and the acquisition cost of US$115 million (as adjusted) for approximately 2,700 net acres within the Sugarkane Field.
The cash balance at the end of the first quarter was US$177 million. The Company's cash and liquidity increased during the quarter as a result of the US$300 million unsecured debt notes issue which provided funds for the Sugarkane operated acquisition and repayment during the quarter of the amount drawn under the Company's secured credit facility (US$60 million).
In addition to existing cash reserves, the Company has further liquidity available from the Group's senior secured revolving credit facility. At the end of the first quarter this debt facility is undrawn with a balance of US$200 million available.
Aurora anticipates the first quarter unaudited Interim Financial Report and Management's Discussion and Analysis, prepared in accordance with Canadian securities legislation requirements, will be filed on or about May 15, 2013.
About Aurora
Aurora is an Australian and Toronto listed oil and gas company active in the over pressured liquids rich region of the Eagle Ford shale in Texas, United States. Aurora is engaged in the development and production of oil, condensate and natural gas in Karnes, Live Oak and Atascosa counties in South Texas. Aurora participates in approximately 79,700 highly contiguous gross acres in the heart of the trend, including approximately 21,800 net acres within the Sugarkane Field in the overpressured and liquids core of the Eagle Ford.
Technical information contained in this report in relation to the Sugarkane field was compiled by Aurora from information provided by the project operator and reviewed by I L Lusted, BSc (Hons), SPE, a Director of Aurora who has had more than 20 years experience in the practice of petroleum engineering. Mr. Lusted consents to the inclusion in this report of the information in the form and context in which it appears.
Cautionary and Forward Looking Statements
Aurora may present petroleum and natural gas production and reserve volumes in barrel of oil equivalent ("BOE") amounts. For purposes of computing such units, a conversion rate of 6,000 cubic feet of natural gas to one barrel of oil equivalent (6:1) is used. The conversion ratio of 6:1 is based on an energy equivalency conversion method which is primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent value equivalence at the wellhead. Readers are cautioned that BOE figures may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation.
Numbers in the tables above may not add due to rounding.
References herein to "Sugarkane" or the "Sugarkane Field" are references to the Sugarkane natural gas and condensate field within the Eagle Ford and includes the two contiguous fields designated by the Texas Railroad Commission as the Sugarkane and Eagleville Fields.
Statements in this press release which reflect management's expectations relating to, among other things, target dates, Aurora's expected drilling program and the ability to fund development are forward-looking statements, and can generally be identified by words such as "will", "expects", "intends", "believes", "estimates", "anticipates" or similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Statements relating to "reserves" are deemed to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions that some or all of the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future.These statements are not historical facts but instead represent management's expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events.
Although management believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These factors include risks related to: exploration, development and production; oil and gas prices, markets and marketing; acquisitions and dispositions; competition; additional funding requirements; reserve estimates being inherently uncertain; incorrect assessments of the value of acquisitions and exploration and development programs; environmental concerns; availability of, and access to, drilling equipment; reliance on key personnel; title to assets; expiration of licences and leases; credit risk; hedging activities; litigation; government policy and legislative changes; unforeseen expenses; negative operating cash flow; contractual risk; and management of growth. In addition, if any of the assumptions or estimates made by management prove to be incorrect, actual results and developments are likely to differ, and may differ materially, from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this document. Such assumptions include, but are not limited to, general economic, market and business conditions and corporate strategy. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements.
All of the forward-looking information in this press release is expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. Forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date of this document and Aurora disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, except as required by law.
Image with caption: "Sugarkane Field Location (CNW Group/Aurora Oil & Gas Limited)". Image available at: http://photos.newswire.ca/images/download/20130429_C9406_PHOTO_EN_26097.jpg
Image with caption: "Aurora Quarterly Net and Gross Daily Production 2012 / 2013 (CNW Group/Aurora Oil & Gas Limited)". Image available at: http://photos.newswire.ca/images/download/20130429_C9406_PHOTO_EN_26098.jpg
SOURCE: Aurora Oil & Gas Limited
Jon Stewart
Aurora Executive Chairman
+61 8 9440 2626
Douglas E Brooks
Group Chief Executive Officer
+1 713 402 1920
Jane Munday
FTI Consulting
+61 8 9485 8888
+61 488 400 248
Aurora Oil & Gas Limited ABN 90 008 787 988
HEAD OFFICE
Level 20, 77 St. Georges Terrace, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
GPO Box 2530 Perth, WA 6001, Australia
t +61 8 9440 2626, f +61 8 9440 2699, e [email protected]
HOUSTON
Aurora USA Oil & Gas, Inc. a subsidiary of Aurora Oil & Gas Limited
1111 Louisiana, Suite 4550, Houston, TX 77002 USA
t +1 713 402 1920, f +1 713 357 9674
Share this article