IN THE MATTER OF Natalie St-Amant - Set Date
News provided by
Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) - General NewsMay 20, 2010, 13:30 ET
MONTRÉAL, May 20 /CNW/ - Notice is hereby given that a hearing will be held before a Hearing Panel of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) on Tuesday June 1, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, at 5 Place Ville-Marie, Suite 1550, Montréal, in the matter of Natalie St-Amant (the Respondent).
The proposed hearing concerns matters for which the Respondent may be disciplined as a Regulated Person of IIROC, pursuant to Part 10 of IIROC Dealer Member Rule 20.
The hearing relates to allegations that:
(a) In August 2005, the Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming and
detrimental to the public interest and failed to observe high
standards of ethics and conduct, particularly with respect to
Standard C of the Conduct and Practices Handbook, which relates to
professionalism, contrary to IDA By-Law 29.1, when she purchased
shares in public company A for her own account and directly from an
insider, B, without prior disclosure of the projected trade to the
firm;
(b) From 2005 to 2006, the Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming and
detrimental to the public interest and failed to observe high
standards of ethics and conduct, contrary to IDA By-Law 29.1,
relative to the merit and relevance of investment recommendations
made with respect to the securities of A and C, considering that the
Respondent and representatives on the team, D and E, held these
securities in their personal accounts, that she had purchased or
obtained them through D, knowing that he had privileged ties with
insiders of these companies, who were also clients of the team, and
that as at December 31, 2005, 248 of the team's accounts held
approximately 18.5% of the outstanding shares in A and 128 accounts
held approximately 1.5% of the outstanding shares in C;
(c) Between January and March 2006, the Respondent engaged in conduct
unbecoming and contrary to the public interest, contrary to IDA By-
Law 29.1, and failed in her duty to protect the public in the matter
of numerous trades effected by the representative of team D in the
securities of F and G, on the orders of the client, H, who proved to
be a consultant to these companies, when she knew or should have
known that the trades were or could be an indication of market
manipulation;
(d) In March 2006, the Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming and
detrimental to the public interest and failed to observe high
standards of ethics and conduct, particularly with respect to
Standard C of the Conduct and Practices Handbook, which relates to
professionalism, contrary to IDA By-Law 29.1, when she purchased
securities of C for her own account, through a representative on the
team, D, without prior disclosure of the projected trade to the firm;
(e) In April 2006, the Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming and
contrary to the public interest and failed to observe high standards
of ethics and conduct, particularly with respect to Standards B and C
of the Conduct and Practices Handbook, which relate to
professionalism, and to the rules stipulated in the Handbook relative
to the examination of complaints from three clients, I, contrary to
IDA By-Law 29.1, when she proceeded to settle the complaints of the
three clients in complicity with another representative on the team,
D, by compensating the clients, the whole without the knowledge of
the firm;
(f) April and May 2006, the Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming and
detrimental to the public interest and failed to observe high
standards of ethics and conduct, particularly with respect to
Standard C of the Conduct and Practices Handbook, which relates to
professionalism, contrary to IDA By-Law 29.1, when she accepted
reimbursement from representative D of her portion of the indemnity
paid to the clients I, which included a payment by cheque and receipt
in her personal account of securities of a public company, C,
directly from D, the whole without the knowledge of the firm;
(g) In June 2006, the Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming and
detrimental to the public interest and failed to observe high
standards of ethics and conduct, particularly with respect to
Standard C of the Conduct and Practices Handbook, which relates to
professionalism, contrary to IDA By-Law 29.1, when she participated
in a private placement in public company J for her own account,
through a representative on the team, D, without prior disclosure of
the projected trade to the firm;
The IDA formally initiated the investigation into the Respondent's conduct on November 10, 2006. The violations are alleged to have occurred while the Respondent was a Registered Representative at the Brossard branch of Desjardins Securities Inc. The Respondent is still employed as a Registered Representative of this firm.
The hearing is open to the public, unless the Hearing Panel orders otherwise.
IIROC is the national self-regulatory organization which oversees all investment dealers and trading activity on debt and equity marketplaces in Canada. Created in 2008 through the consolidation of the Investment Dealers Association of Canada and Market Regulation Services Inc., IIROC sets high quality regulatory and investment industry standards, protects investors and strengthens market integrity while maintaining efficient and competitive capital markets. IIROC carries out its regulatory responsibilities through setting and enforcing rules regarding the proficiency, business and financial conduct of dealer firms and their registered employees and through setting and enforcing market integrity rules regarding trading activity on Canadian equity marketplaces.
For further information: Claudyne Bienvenu, Regional Director, Regulation, (514) 878-2854, [email protected]; Jeff Kehoe, Acting Vice President, Enforcement, (416) 943-6996, [email protected]
Share this article