IN THE MATTER OF Mario Bouchard - Settlement
News provided by
Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) - General NewsJan 19, 2010, 14:00 ET
MONTRÉAL,
(a) On or about July 6, 2004, the Respondent failed in his duty to
protect the public in supervising the transactions effected in the
account of client "A" by a representative under his supervision,
with regard to deposits of share certificates, notably by an
insider who was also a client of the Respondent, thereby failing
to ensure that these transactions were within the bounds of good
business practice, although he knew or should have known that the
transactions could be an indicator of an activity or behaviour
that was suspicious or contrary to the public interest, contrary
to Regulation 1300, Policy No. 2 and By-Law 29 of the Association;
(b) From July 2004 to October 2004, the Respondent failed in his duty
to protect the public in supervising the transactions effected in
the account of client "A" by a representative under his
supervision, with regard to the routine execution of sell orders
following deposits of share certificates, notably by an insider
who was also a client of the Respondent, and to requests for the
issuance of cheques to third parties, thereby failing to ensure
that these transactions were within the bounds of good business
practice, although he knew or should have known that the
transactions could be an indicator of an activity or behaviour
that was suspicious or contrary to the public interest, contrary
to Regulation 1300, Policy No. 2 and By-Law 29 of the Association;
(c) From July 2004 to October 2004, the Respondent failed to track and
keep a proper record of his daily supervision reviews and of his
inquiries and their follow-up, with regard to the transactions
executed in the account of client "A", as required by Policy No. 2
and By-law 29 of the Association.
(d) On or about September 29, 2006, the Respondent engaged in business
conduct unbecoming or detrimental to the public interest, in that
he failed to respect Standard C of the Conduct and Practices
Handbook, which relates to professionalism, when he covered the
losses of client "I" with his own funds, without the knowledge of
the firm, contrary to By-law 29.1.
IIROC formally initiated the investigations into the Respondent's conduct on
The hearing is not open to the public unless and until the Settlement Agreement has been accepted by the Hearing Panel. If the Hearing Panel accepts the Settlement Agreement, the Hearing Panel's decision and reasons will be made available to the public.
IIROC is the national self-regulatory organization which oversees all investment dealers and trading activity on debt and equity marketplaces in
For further information: Carmen Crépin, Vice President, Québec, (514) 878-2854, [email protected]; Jeff Kehoe, Director, Enforcement Litigation, (416) 943-6996, [email protected]
Share this article