Russell Canadian Active Manager Report Highlights
74% of large cap managers beat the S&P/TSX Composite Index in the third
quarter of 2013
Value managers lead but all styles outperform again
Q4 environment not so clear
TORONTO, Oct. 31, 2013 /CNW/ - For the fourth consecutive quarter, the
majority of large cap investment managers in Canada added value and
beat the benchmark. In the third quarter of 2013, 74% of large cap
managers outperformed the S&P/TSX Composite Index, following a record
96% in the second quarter. In the third quarter, the median large cap
manager return was 7.0%, compared to the S&P/TSX Composite Index's
return of 6.2%.
"The last time we experienced four consecutive quarters in which large
cap managers beat the benchmark was the second quarter of 2007 and
overall that environment was not nearly as strong as what we've seen
this time", highlights Kathleen Wylie, Head, Canadian Equity Research
at Russell Investments Canada. "In the most recent four quarters, an
average of 83% of large cap managers beat the benchmark with the median
manager return ahead of the benchmark by roughly 150 basis points on
average. That's significantly stronger than in 2007 when an average of
57% of large cap managers beat the benchmark in four consecutive
quarters by an average of 30 basis points."
The Russell Canadian Active Manager Report is produced quarterly and is
based on recently released data from more than 150 Canadian
institutional equity investment manager products.
In the third quarter of 2013, there was less sector breadth than in the
previous quarter, with only four out of 10 sectors beating the
benchmark, down from seven out of 10 in the second quarter. "The
performance in the third quarter was not driven by sector positioning,"
highlights Wylie, "as active managers were only favourably positioned
in three out of 10 sectors. Normally, that would make for a challenging
active management environment, but the performance of most investment
managers was driven by stock selection, which we believe adds more
value than sector bets in the long run."
Large cap investment managers in Canada on average are underweight the
Energy sector, which outperformed the benchmark and was the 2nd highest contributor in the third quarter. Highlighting the importance
of stock selection in the quarter was Suncor Energy Inc., which was up
nearly 20%, and the top-contributing stock in the Index. It was held by
74% of large cap managers at an average overweight of more than 1%, so
that helped their benchmark-relative performance.
Investment managers in Canada are also underweight the Financials sector
on average, which was the third top-performing sector, but within
Financials, managers were heavily weighted to the bank stocks so that
would have benefited benchmark-relative performance. Toronto Dominion
Bank was the second top-contributing stock in the Index, up 11% and
held by 88% of large cap managers. Royal Bank of Canada was the third
top contributor, up 9% in the quarter and held by 81% of large cap
managers. Bank of Montreal, also a top contributor, is less widely held
but was still owned by more than half the large cap managers at the
start of the quarter. "Of the top 10 contributing stocks, five were
banks," highlighted Wylie "and all of them were held by the majority of
After declining for three consecutive quarters, gold stocks were strong
in the quarter, up 8%. "Large cap managers on average are underweight
the gold stocks relative to the benchmark weight, so that can make it
challenging for managers to beat the benchmark when gold stocks rise,"
explains Wylie. "However, the weight of gold stocks in the Index at the
start of the third quarter had dropped to less than 6% and large cap
managers on average were only 3% underweight. That's a huge change from
mid-2011 when the weight of gold stocks peaked at 14% and large cap
managers on average were nearly 6% underweight on average."
Investment manager performance was also helped by what they did not own
in the quarter. BlackBerry Ltd., formerly Research in Motion, fell 27%
in the third quarter but was only held by 31% of large cap managers.
Cameco was also a negative contributor, falling 14% but only held by
34% of large cap managers.
Potash Corp. is a stock that did not help active managers since it was
the largest negative contributor and was held by 67% of large cap
Value Slightly Ahead of Growth But All Styles Outperform
In the third quarter, 76% of value managers beat the benchmark compared
to 75% of growth and 55% of dividend-focused managers. All manager
medians were ahead of the benchmark: the median value manager return
was 7.4%, the median growth return was 7.0% and the median dividend
manager return was 6.5%. Sector positioning overall did not explain the
differences in performance although value managers benefited most from
having the largest overweight to the Consumer Discretionary sector,
growth managers benefited from being overweight Energy on average, and
dividend managers benefited from having the largest underweight to
The strength in gold stocks helped growth managers the most since they
have the smallest underweight compared to the other styles. Growth
managers were 2.6% underweight at the start of the third quarter
compared to value managers who were 3.1% underweight and
dividend-focused managers who were 4.1% underweight.
"Most quarters, it's easy to explain why one style did better than
another but it really wasn't clear cut this quarter," says Wylie. "It
just came down to stock picking and really there wasn't even a big
difference between the highest and lowest manager return this quarter.
The top performing manager return was 11.1% and the bottom return was
2.2% for a difference of just under 9%, which was the lowest in three
Fourth Quarter Looking Mixed So Far
Sector breadth has improved so far in the final quarter of the year with
six out of 10 sectors ahead of the benchmark and large cap managers
favourably positioned in five out of 10 sectors. The Energy and
Materials sectors are underperforming, which should help large cap
managers who are underweight on average. Large cap managers have their
largest overweight in Consumer Discretionary stocks, which are
outperforming. They are also likely benefiting from overweights to
Consumer Staples and Industrials, with both sectors among the top
By style, performance appears to be mixed so far in the fourth quarter.
Value managers may be leading the way again compared to growth
managers, with their overweights to Consumer Staples and Consumer
Discretionary and their underweights to Energy and Materials helping.
Growth managers are likely being hurt by their 2% overweight to the
Energy sector, which is underperforming so far in the fourth quarter.
Dividend managers are likely being helped by the underperformance of
Energy and Materials and the outperformance of Financials and
Utilities. They have their largest overweight in Telecommunication
Services so how that sector ends up performing will impact performance.
"Right now things are changing day-to-day so it's difficult to get a
clear picture but we are generally in a favourable active management
environment," highlights Wylie. "I know that during the financial
crisis, investors began to question the value of active management but
the improvement highlights that over the long run it does add value. In
the last 10 years, 55% of large cap managers have beaten the benchmark
on average per quarter and the first-quartile manager return has beaten
the S&P/TSX Composite return by 165 basis points on average per
quarter. Even over five years, the numbers are exceptionally strong
with the first quartile manager return ahead by 200 basis points on
average per quarter."
Russell Releases Research Paper on the Canadian Active Management
For a longer term perspective, Russell Investments has released a
research paper titled "Equity Active Management in Canada: The Changes and the Challenges," which digs deep into the active management environment in Canada and
explains what factors have had the largest impact on Canadian equity
managers' ability to beat the benchmark in last five years and why the
environment has improved in the last year. The paper can be found at www.Russell.com/ca.
For more information on the benefits of active management and for
information on Russell Investments please contact us at 1-888-509-1792.
For institutional clients, please contact us at 1-866-737-2228.
About Russell Investments
Russell Investments (Russell) is a global asset manager and one of only
a few firms that offers actively managed multi-asset portfolios and
services that include advice, investments and implementation. Working
with institutional investors, financial advisors and individuals,
Russell's core capabilities extend across capital market insights,
manager research, portfolio construction, portfolio implementation and
Russell has more than C$253.7 billion* in assets under management (as of
9/30/2013) and works with over 2,500 institutional clients, independent
distribution partners and individual investors globally. As a
consultant to some of the largest pools of capital in the world,
Russell has US$2.4 trillion in assets under advisement (as of
6/30/2013). It has four decades of experience researching and selecting
investment managers and meets annually with more than 2,200 managers
around the world. Russell traded more than US$1.4 trillion in 2012
through its implementation services business. Approximately US$4.1
trillion in assets are benchmarked to the Russell Indexes.
Headquartered in Seattle, Washington, Russell operates globally,
including through its offices in Seattle, New York, London, Paris,
Amsterdam, Sydney, Melbourne, Auckland, Singapore, Seoul, Tokyo,
Beijing, Toronto, Chicago, San Diego, Milwaukee and Edinburgh. For more
information about how Russell helps to improve financial security for
people, visit www.russell.com or follow @Russell_News.
*includes more than US$70 billion of derivative overlay assets under
management not included prior to June 30, 2013
Nothing in this publication is intended to constitute legal, tax
securities or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the
appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. This
is a publication of Russell Investments Canada Limited and has been
prepared solely for information purposes. It is made available on an
"as is" basis. Russell Investments Canada Limited does not make any
warranty or representation regarding the information.
Unless otherwise stated all index data is sourced from ©BNY Mellon Asset
Servicing. All rights reserved.
Russell Investments and the Russell Investments logo are registered
trademarks of Frank Russell Company, used under license by Russell
Investments Canada Limited.
Copyright © Russell Investments 2013. All rights reserved. This material
is proprietary and may not be reproduced, transferred, or distributed
in any form without prior written permission from Russell Investments.
SOURCE: Russell Investments Canada Limited
For further information:
Beja Rodeck Communications
For real-time news updates, follow @Russell_News on Twitter.