OTTAWA, May 16, 2013 /CNW/ - British Columbia is the only province to
receive an overall "A" in The Conference Board of Canada's analysis of
health status of provincial populations.
Six provinces received a "D" on these indicators of the health of the
population, which include the incidence of and mortality rates from
diseases. The health status rankings are part of a major report, Paving the Road to Higher Performance: Benchmarking Provincial Health
Systems, which will be released on Thursday, May 23.
"Many indicators in this category are linked to health conditions that
will lead to greater demand for health care services," said Gabriela
Prada, Director, Health Innovation, Policy and Evaluation.
"Our analysis is not meant to 'shame and blame' provinces that do
relatively poorly on any given indicator," said Prada. "Our intention
is to identify performance achievements and gaps so that all provinces
are better equipped to make decisions that will improve health care
systems and population health."
The findings released today are the first of four categories published
by The Conference Board of Canada in its benchmarking of provincial
health systems, produced under the Canadian Alliance for Sustainable Health Care. In all, 90 indicators are assessed in the categories of Lifestyle
Factors, Health Status, Health Resources, and Health Care System
British Columbia gets an overall "A" grade for Health Status. B.C. also
earns "A" grades on all three sub-categories: life expectancy and
perceived health status; incidence of disease; and mortality due to
Incidences of various diseases, including diabetes, high blood pressure,
and mood disorders, continue to increase in Canada.
Mortality due to diabetes, as well as circulatory and respiratory
diseases, have declined - despite a rise in the incidence of these
The Health Status category contains 30 indicators, which are divided
into three sub-categories:
life expectancy and perceived health status (nine indicators)
incidence of disease (13 indicators), and
mortality due to disease (eight indicators).
British Columbia gets "A" grades across all three sub-categories.
Alberta, Ontario and Quebec get overall "B" grades, and generally earn
'B' grades or better on the sub-categories. Saskatchewan, Manitoba and
the four Atlantic provinces receive overall 'D' grades.
In the sub-category of life expectancy and perceived health status, B.C.
and Quebec earn overall "A" grades, while Alberta, Ontario and Prince
Edward Island obtain "B" grades.
From an international perspective, Canada performs well in low birth
weight babies. Even provinces with relatively high rates of low
birth-rate babies compare well against the percentages among
international peers. However, Canadian provinces fare less well on
infant mortality, an indicator often used to monitor child health and
the well-being of a society over time. Although infant mortality has
decreased by more than half since the 1980s, Canada's top-performing
provinces on this indicator are middle performers when compared with
Canada has several lackluster results on the incidence of diseases.
Overall, Canada has the fourth-highest prevalence of diabetes among the
34 OECD member countries. The incidence of high blood pressure and mood
disorders has also increased in Canada.
Nine provinces get "A" or "B" grades on the indicator of newly-reported
HIV cases. The exception is Saskatchewan, whose recorded 2011 rate of
19.6 per 100,000 population is more than double the national average of
In the sub-category of mortality due to diseases, Ontario and B.C. earn
overall "A" grades. Alberta earns a good overall grade of "B" although
it receives "C" grades on three of the eight indicators explored. On
the other hand, P.E.I. and Newfoundland and Labrador, receiving "D"
grades for at least half of the mortality indicators.
Manitoba and Saskatchewan obtain "D" grades for mortality due to
suicide. Given that suicide rates are five to seven times higher for
First Nations and Inuit youth than for non-Aboriginal youth, the large
proportion of Aboriginal populations in these provinces might explain
the relatively high suicide rates.
The Conference Board of Canada benchmarks performance using an A-B-C-D
report card ranking methodology. Grade levels are assigned to the
indicators using the following method:
For each indicator, the difference between the top and bottom performer
is calculated and this figure is divided by 4.
A province receives a report card rating of "A" on a given indicator if
its score is in the top quartile, a "B" if its score is in the second
quartile, a "C" if its score is in the third quartile, and a "D" if its
score is in the bottom quartile.
This methodology helps to ensure that those regions awarded an "A" on a
given indicator perform substantially better than the range of
performances among the other regions.
The remaining segments of the benchmarking report to be released are:
Lifestyle Factors - Friday, May 17
Health System Resources and Performance - Wednesday, May 22
Overall Grades - Thursday, May 23
The overall findings will be revealed at The Conference Board of
Canada's Western Summit on Sustainable Health, to be held May 22-23 at The Westin, Edmonton. This forum will provide
an opportunity for all health stakeholders from across the West to
connect, share ideas, and discuss how to transform the health care
system and improve the health of Canadians.
Launched in 2011, the Canadian Alliance for Sustainable Health Care is a five-year Conference Board program of research and dialogue. It
will delve deeply into facets of Canada's health care challenge,
including the financial, workplace, and institutional dimensions, in an
effort to develop forward-looking qualitative and quantitative analysis
and solutions to make the system more sustainable.
SOURCE: Conference Board of Canada
For further information:
Brent Dowdall, Media Relations, Tel.: 613- 526-3090 ext. 448