VANCOUVER, April 16 /CNW/ - Living Oceans Society, the Pembina Institute,
and ForestEthics are calling on the federal government to significantly
strengthen the proposed environmental assessment for the proposed Enbridge
Gateway Pipeline. If built, the dual pipelines would extend from the Alberta
tar sands to the British Columbia coast, requiring tankers to ship both crude
oil to markets in Asia and the US, and condensate, a product used in tar sands
production, to Alberta. Preliminary research indicates that this project will
be responsible for 6.5 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year -
the equivalent of 1.6 million more cars on the road annually.
Enbridge has applied for approval to build the pipeline from the Canadian
Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) and the National Energy Board (NEB).
These two agencies are working together to conduct a Joint Review Process
(JRP) to assess the pipeline proposal. The groups are concerned that the scope
of the Joint Review Process is too narrow and fails to consider risks to
climate and the health of the oceans posed by the pipeline.
"This pipeline is inextricably linked to the expansion of tar sands
projects, which will in turn increase Canada's greenhouse gas emissions," said
Nikki Skuce, Energy Campaigner with ForestEthics. "The tar sands are the
fastest growing source of climate pollution in Canada, and these impacts must
be assessed by the government's process."
"We remain perplexed by the federal government's complete about face on
the longstanding tanker moratorium", said Oonagh O'Connor of the Living Oceans
Society. "For over 30 years, coastal residents have lived with the
understanding that a long-standing moratorium has protected their communities,
the environment, and the coastal economy from the threat of oil spills. To
ignore this moratorium shows a lack of concern for the people who work and
live on this coast."
In addition to the environmental issues, the groups are concerned that
the proposed Joint Review Panel does not address legal obligations to First
Nations. The pipeline and tanker routes would cross through the traditional
territory of dozens of B.C. First Nations.
"The draft Terms of Reference fail to ensure that legal obligations to
consult First Nations are fully satisfied before the panel begins, which means
that the prospect of protracted court cases with First Nations could delay the
process, and waste time and money for all," said Karen Campbell of the Pembina
Through their counsel, Ecojustice, the organizations have made many
recommendations regarding the proposed process, including: ensuring that First
Nations concerns are fully satisfied before the panel proceeds; calling on the
federal government to consult extensively about maintaining the tanker
moratorium in advance of the panel process; and including the impacts of tar
For further information:
For further information: Oonagh O'Connor, Living Oceans Society, (250)
973-6580; Karen Campbell, Pembina Institute, (604) 928-2258; Nikki Skuce,
ForestEthics, (250) 877-7762