TORONTO, Aug. 28 /CNW/ - More than 900 Crown attorneys prosecute
approximately 500,000 charges each year on behalf of the people of Ontario. It
is a fundamental responsibility of the Crown to ensure that the public
interest is served. This can only be done by keeping the duty of fairness in
the forefront of every prosecution and by taking concrete measures to guard
against any potential miscarriages of justice. Over the past several years,
the ministry has acted, and continues to act, in numerous ways to minimize the
risk of potential miscarriages of justice.
Acting on Recommendations from the Commission of Inquiry into the
Proceedings Involving Guy Paul Morin
In April 1998, a Commission of Inquiry into the Proceedings Involving Guy
Paul Morin, headed by the Honourable Fred Kaufman, a former judge of the
Quebec Court of Appeal, released its report. As a result, the Ministry of the
Attorney General implemented several measures to reduce the risk of wrongful
convictions in Ontario, including the development of detailed Crown policies
and training relating to:
- Restricted use of in-custody or "jailhouse" informers - to ensure any
proposed evidence is carefully reviewed and sufficiently reliable
- The use of physical scientific evidence - to ensure it is presented
with appropriate weight
- Witness interviews - to ensure prosecutors do not inadvertently
influence a witness's testimony.
In addition, practice memoranda were issued on:
- The important dual role of Crown counsel as both prosecutors and
ministers of justice
- The working relationship between police and the Crown.
Heads of Prosecution Committee on the Prevention of Miscarriages of
Senior federal, provincial and territorial justice officials make up the
Canada-wide Heads of Prosecutions Committee.
In fall 2002, the Heads of Prosecutions Working Group on the Prevention
of Miscarriages of Justice was formed in response to a number of high profile
wrongful conviction cases across the country, including David Milgaard in
Saskatchewan, Thomas Sophonow in Manitoba and Guy Paul Morin.
Ontario has played a significant role in this group, which has a mandate
- Develop a list of best practices to help both prosecutors and police
better understand the causes of wrongful convictions
- Recommend action such as policies, protocols and education to guard
against future miscarriages of justice.
Ontario took a lead role in developing the Report of the Working Group and
in January 2005, the report was approved at the Federal/Provincial/Territorial
Justice Ministers' Meeting.
Given Ontario's leadership role in this area, many of the report's
recommendations were already in place in this province. The ministry:
- Continues to refer cases to a committee of experts regarding use of
in-custody informers first established in 1998 to review all in-
custody informers who are proposed by the Crown as witnesses in
- Continues to use an in-custody informer registry for people who were
proposed to the committee regardless of whether or not they are
called as witnesses
- Launched a revised Ontario Crown Policy Manual in March 2006,
including practice memoranda and policies regarding the role of the
Crown, disclosure, in-custody informers, interviewing witnesses,
scientific evidence, Crown relationships with police, conceding
appeals and fresh evidence
- Ensures that the Crown Policy Manual is kept up to date.
Ontario's Crown policies are available on the Attorney General's website
at www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca. Practice memoranda are also available to
members of the public upon request.
Ontario Criminal Conviction Review Committee
In May 2006, the Attorney General announced the establishment of the
Ontario Criminal Conviction Review Committee to provide expert leadership and
act as a resource to Crowns across the province in the prevention of wrongful
convictions. The committee is composed of six senior Crown counsel from across
Ontario and is advised by the Honourable Patrick LeSage, former Chief Justice
of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
- Reviews criminal convictions where it is alleged that there has been
a miscarriage of justice
- Provides expert advice and guidance to Crowns in dealing with some of
the difficult issues relating to potential miscarriages of justice
- Develops educational and policy programs aimed at preventing
miscarriages of justice
- Develops protocols and best practices for dealing with these cases
and preventing future miscarriages of justice.
Response to Chief Coroner's Review of Pediatric Forensic Pathology
On April 19, 2007, Ontario's Chief Coroner released the results of a
review of 45 cases handled by pediatric forensic pathologist Charles Smith and
determined there were problematic scientific findings in 20 of the cases, 12
of which involved convictions and one in which the accused was declared not
The Ministry of the Attorney General responded immediately by assigning
Crowns to all of the cases where there were criminal convictions, and
cooperating fully to expedite any actions taken by the defense in individual
cases where injustices were claimed.
For example, the ministry quickly:
- Consented to bail in the case of R.v. Mullins-Johnson
- Consented to bail in the case of R.v. Trotta
- Agreed to an extension of time for an appeal application in the case
of R.v. Sherrett.
Commission of Inquiry
On April 25, 2007, the Attorney General announced the terms of reference
for a full public inquiry into the practice of pediatric forensic pathology
and its future use in investigations and criminal proceedings, in light of the
Chief Coroner's review.
Justice Stephen Goudge of the Ontario Court of Appeal was appointed to
head the inquiry, supported by an expert panel of scientists and medical
professionals chaired by Senator Larry Campbell, a former Chief Coroner of
Justice Goudge has been asked to review and assess the systemic policies,
procedures, practices, accountability and oversight mechanisms, quality
control measures and institutional arrangements related to pediatric forensic
pathology. He is to report back to the legislature no later than April 25,
Information and updates on the inquiry can be found at the inquiry's
website at www.goudgeinquiry.ca.
Ongoing Education for Crown Attorneys
Ontario is a national leader in Crown policy development and education. A
four-week series of educational sessions is held every summer, a weeklong
educational conference is held every spring and specific conferences and
training sessions are held throughout the year so that Ontario's prosecutors
can share experiences and best practices and learn from other jurisdictions.
The ministry ensures ongoing education for Crowns on a variety of factors
and issues related to miscarriages of justice. Examples include:
- A comprehensive, multi-disciplinary training session on eyewitness
identification in spring 2005
- An international conference on wrongful convictions held in Winnipeg
in October, 2005
- A program at the Osgoode Professional Development Centre in November
2005, on expert evidence, focusing on wrongful convictions and
- A DNA evidence symposium held annually
- A presentation by the Ontario Criminal Conviction Review Committee at
the spring 2006 educational conference.
Preventing and addressing miscarriages of justice is an ongoing priority
of the Ministry of the Attorney General. The ministry is committed to
addressing claims of miscarriages of justice in the past, and doing all that
it can to prevent them in the future.
Disponible en français
CASE HISTORY OF R. V. STEVEN TRUSCOTT
On June 9, 1959, 12-year-old Lynne Harper was murdered. Her body was
found in a wood lot near the Clinton, Ontario air force base.
On June 13, 1959, 14-year-old Steven Truscott was charged as a juvenile
with Harper's murder.
On June 30, 1959, the Juvenile and Family Court ordered that Truscott be
tried as an adult. Leave to appeal that decision was later denied by both the
Ontario High Court and the Ontario Court of Appeal.
On September 16, 1959, the trial began before the Honourable Mr. Justice
Ferguson of the Supreme Court of Ontario and a jury at Goderich, Ontario. The
trial continued for 13 days.
On September 30, 1959, the jury delivered its unanimous guilty verdict.
All 12 members of the jury acknowledged their vote to convict Mr. Truscott,
who was immediately sentenced to death, as required by the law at that time.
On October 10, 1959, an appeal against conviction was filed with the
Ontario Court of Appeal. The appeal was argued over three days before a
five-member panel of the Court.
On January 20, 1960, the Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, for
reasons drafted by the Chief Justice of Ontario.
On January 21, 1960, the federal government commuted the sentence of
death to a term of life imprisonment.
On February 24, 1960, Mr. Truscott's application for leave to appeal to
the Supreme Court of Canada was denied.
On April 26, 1966, the Governor General in Council took the extraordinary
step of ordering a review of the case by the Supreme Court of Canada,
directing the Court to receive any further evidence that it saw fit to allow.
From October 5, 1966 to October 12, 1966, the Supreme Court of Canada
considered 17 grounds of appeal. In a rare proceeding, the Supreme Court of
Canada heard evidence from 26 witnesses.
On May 4, 1967, the Supreme Court of Canada, by a majority of 8-1,
indicated that had the case been an appeal from Mr. Truscott's conviction, the
Court would have dismissed the appeal. The sole dissenting judge would have
allowed the appeal, quashed the conviction and ordered a new trial.
On October 1, 1969, by an Act of Parliament, Mr. Truscott was released on
parole at the age of 24, after serving 10 years in prison.
On November 28, 2001, Mr. Truscott applied to the federal minister of
justice for a further review of the conviction, pursuant to what is now
section 696.1 of the Criminal Code.
On January 24, 2002, the federal minister of justice appointed former
Quebec Court of Appeal judge Fred Kaufman to examine the application and
provide advice on its merits.
On April 19, 2004, Mr. Kaufman's report was provided to the federal
minister of justice.
On October 28, 2004, the federal minister of justice found that there was
a "reasonable basis to conclude that a miscarriage of justice likely occurred"
and referred the case to the Ontario Court of Appeal pursuant to section
696.3(3)(a)(ii) of the Criminal Code, directing the Court to determine the
case as if it were an appeal by the accused on the issue of fresh evidence.
Counsel for Mr. Truscott tendered a large volume of material as "fresh
evidence," including several new expert reports and information from 69
On March 2, 2006, as part of the Crown's investigation into the fresh
evidence, the Attorney General ordered the disinterment of Lynne Harper's
remains for potential DNA analysis. The disinterment took place on April 6,
2006. On April 10, 2006, Ontario's Chief Coroner announced that the state of
the remains made DNA testing impossible.
From June 19, 2006 to July 7, 2006, a five-member panel of the Court of
Appeal, led by Chief Justice Roy McMurtry, heard testimony from 18 witnesses.
Between January 31 and February 14, 2007, the Court heard oral arguments
and reserved judgment.
Disponible en français
For further information:
For further information: Brendan Crawley, Ministry of the Attorney
General, Communications Branch, (416) 326-2210