PC Party claims Stephen Harper manipulated system for his own means
NEWMARKET, ON, Oct. 2 /CNW/ - Former federal Cabinet Minister, the
Honourable Sinclair Stevens, today commended the action of Democracy Watch, a
non-partisan group advocating for government accountability, for filing suit
in federal court seeking to have the September 7th dissolution of parliament
declared illegal. Mr. Stevens is currently the leader of the Progressive
Canadian (PC) Party, the successor to the former Progressive Conservative
Party of Canada, that is fielding candidates in several provinces this federal
"Prime Minister Stephen Harper has used the electoral system to his
unfair advantage and in doing so, has broken his own law created a little over
a year ago," stated Mr. Stevens. "Bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canada
Elections Act including fixed election dates, was according to his own
Minister, designed to provide 'greater fairness, increased transparency and
predictability, improved policy planning, increased voter turnout, and
assistance in attracting the best qualified Canadians to public life'. These
are all fundamental issues of equality that Canadians have been asking for and
were led to believe had been achieved through the passing of Bill C-16."
Mr. Stevens points out that when introducing Bill C-16 for second
reading, the Honourable Rob Nicholson, Leader of the Government in the House
of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform, said: "What we have (now) is a
situation where the Prime Minister is able to choose the date of the election,
not based necessarily on the best interests of the country but on the best
interests of his or her political party. I believe Bill C-16 would address
those concerns." Mr. Stevens contends that Stephen Harper not only broke the
law with this election call, but deceived Canadians as well.
"It is our contention that Mr. Harper knew full well when this
legislation was tabled that he would ultimately retain control of calling an
election," said Mr. Stevens. "By including the provision in the Bill, "Nothing
in the Act affects the power of the Governor General to dissolve Parliament
whenever the Governor General sees fit," Mr. Harper believed it made him look
like a democracy reformer in favour of a fairer election system. In reality he
felt he could call an election whenever it suited him."
"Mr. Harper had strategically decided to have an election on October
14th, 2008, months in advance of that date, leading everyone else to believe
that the next election was set, as per legislation, for October 19, 2009,"
said Mr. Stevens. "This is extremely unfair and an affront to democracy. The
Harper Conservatives had an advantage of at least 90 days to plan, finance and
organize their election campaign over all other parties. All federal parties
have to comply with Elections Canada's more restrictive spending rules during
the 37 day campaign. Mr. Harper's Conservatives were the only ones in a
position to take advantage of unrestricted campaign spending opportunities
because they were the only ones who knew an election was going to be called."
Mr. Stevens points out that the Harper government reaped benefits from its
unfair advantage in several ways, including:
1. Announcing hundreds of millions of dollars in future spending in the
days leading up to the election call on September 7th this year.
2. Spending millions of dollars in pre-election advertising, primarily
on attack ads against Liberal leader Stéphane Dion.
3. Taking advantage of the "10% program," where M.P.'s are allowed, at
government expense, to send "information literature" to up to 10% of
the constituents in other ridings. Mr. Stevens in his own riding of
Oak Ridges-Markham received 10 different pieces of literature under
this method from various conservative M.P.'s including Mr. Harper, a
questionable use of public funds.
4. Calling three by-elections and then later a fourth by-election.
Interestingly, three of the by-elections were to take place the day
after the dissolution of Parliament by Mr. Harper, therefore
extending those campaigns by an additional 37 days at incredible
5. Mr. Harper, realizing he would be restricted under the Canada
Elections Act in a 37 day election period both in the raising and
spending of money, chose to secretly commence his election campaign
months earlier, giving him an unfair advantage.
"Regardless of the outcome of this law suit, the fact remains that
Stephen Harper has acted in an extremely deceitful way towards all Canadians,
in order to enact his own agenda," added Mr. Stevens. "For years fixed
election dates have been seen as an essential necessity to ensure a fairer
election system in Canada. Mr. Harper took this worthy concept and warped it
to give himself ultimate political clout. It is imperative that Canadians
understand this and choose not to give him a majority mandate. It is our
belief that Mr. Harper's true mission is to transform Canada into a loose
confederation of autonomous provinces. Under the pretext of giving us a fairer
election system with fixed election dates, Stephen Harper, if he wins a
majority, will hurl the nation into an ultra neo-conservative regime similar
to that of the Bush administration in the United States, along with its
disastrous financial situation and poor environmental future."
"We support Democracy Watch in its legal pursuit to determine if this
election call violates the Canada Elections Act and, or, the Charter.
Progressive Canadians across the country believe this is an issue of fairness
and accountability and look forward to a favourable court decision," added Mr.
Democracy Watch has filed a motion to have a hearing of its application
before the October 14th voting day. The motion will be considered by the
Federal Court on Thursday, October 2, 2008 at The D'Arcy McGee Building, 90
Sparks St. in Ottawa at 9:30 am. Further information on the motion can be
found at www.dwatch.ca
For further information:
For further information: or to arrange an interview, please contact:
Honourable Sinclair Stevens, Leader, Progressive Canadian (PC) Party, Tel:
1-888-666-3821, firstname.lastname@example.org, www.progressivecanadian.ca