Open Letter from CAW to Prime Minister and Premiers



    TORONTO, Jan. 15 /CNW/ -

    
    January 14, 2009

    Open Letter to the Prime Minister of Canada and Provincial/Territorial
    Premiers on the occasion of their First Ministers Meeting in Ottawa
    January 16, 2009

    Jobs Crisis Calls for Agreement on New E.I. and Training Supports

    Dear Sirs:
    
    We are calling on you as our elected leaders to collectively forge an
agreement that provides new Employment Insurance and training supports as part
of an economic stimulus package that responds to the gathering storm in
Canada's job market.
    The crisis has already inflicted considerable pain on families and
communities. A further battering looms, with layoffs in virtually all sectors
of the economy.
    There is broad consensus on the need for better EI benefits. The Council
of Chief Executives has joined in the call for improvements urged by unions
and various parliamentary committees, and reflected in Bill C269 and many
others.
    Unemployment insurance can be the most powerful of all economic
stabilizers. A federal study has shown that during the recessions of the early
'80s and '90s, UI prevented deeper and longer downturns and reduced the shock
of both job and GDP losses.
    But we've entered this new economic crisis with a much weaker EI system.
It provides only half the coverage it did in the last recession. At any given
time only 42% of the unemployed are receiving EI - because fewer workers
qualify and because benefit weeks were reduced.
    The US Congress has seen the wisdom of giving priority to adjusting the
UI system as part of their stimulus package. In November they passed a second
federal extension to state unemployment benefits which means that workers in
many states are now collecting up to 59 weeks of benefits. A bill supported by
President-elect Barack Obama would provide a further extension to the end of
2009. If that happens, workers laid off in early 2008 may be collecting UI
benefits for up to two years in many states.
    In Canada the EI maximum is 45 weeks but only for regions with 10%
unemployment. Most workers live where the maximum is only 36 to 40 weeks. From
coast to coast, workers in cities like Vancouver, Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg,
Ottawa, Quebec City, Fredericton and Halifax have a maximum of 36 weeks.

    
    We've gotten EI wrong on at least three accounts.

    -   We've made it more difficult to qualify for benefits. In a region
        with 8 to 9% unemployment, qualifying hours are more than 3 times
        what they were in the recession of the early 1980s and more than
        double what they were in the early '90s.

    -   We've reduced the duration of benefits. Many displaced workers are
        shocked to find that benefits don't run to 50 weeks as they used to.
        While a pilot project extends benefits by 5 weeks to a 45 week
        maximum, it only applies to 21 of the 58 EI regions.

    -   We've reduced the benefit level, now only 55% of earnings. At one
        time it was 66 2/3%. There's also a 2009 maximum of $447 (below the
        $465 maximum set for 1996 then cancelled) which means workers earning
        over $900 weekly get less than half their former earnings.
        Furthermore, workers are forced to exhaust any severance pay before
        getting EI.

    It's time to repay some of the more than $54 Billion that successive
governments have borrowed from the EI "surplus" premiums paid by workers and
employers. Indeed, until 1989 the federal government actually contributed to
the EI Account to pay for extended benefits. It has not contributed since
then.

    We urgently petition you to support these measures as part of a stimulus 
package:

    1.  (a) Increase benefit duration to at least 50 weeks in all regions;

        (b) Provide an additional year of "Special Extension" benefits if
            national unemployment exceeds 6.5%, paid from federal general
            revenues.

        (c) Further extend EI Part 1 benefits as "Skills Development Income
            Support" so long as the worker remains in approved training. New
            provincial training initiatives and course completion rates will
            inevitably suffer if workers do not have sufficient income. This
            will be particularly important where long-term workers need
            extended training and literacy programs. Those who don't qualify
            for EI should be given similar income support through funding
            increases to Labour Market Agreements.

    2.  Set a fixed 360 hours to qualify for all types of EI benefits - in
        all regions.

        Currently the requirement is set monthly and varies from 420 to 700
        hours depending on the unemployment rate in each of the 58 EI
        regions. There is no reasonable justification for this variation.
        Many workers can't meet the tough new requirements especially given
        the growth in part-time and temporary jobs Prior to 1996 when an
        insurable week was defined as 15 hours or more, workers could qualify
        for a short duration claim with fewer than 360 hours.

    3.  Eliminate the 2 week unpaid "waiting" period.

    4. (a)  Provide benefits that are at least 60% of earnings, based on
            workers' 12 best weeks of earnings, and increase the $447 maximum
            benefit rate.

       (b)  Suspend the allocation of severance pay.


    5.  Actively promote and expedite E.I. Work Sharing including a new Work
        Sharing While Learning program. Encourage innovative uses of these
        programs to help workers stay on the job.

    6.  Revamp Older Worker Adjustment Initiatives, including supports for
        intensive re-training and bridging to retirement. This will be
        particularly important for long term employees in vulnerable
        industries and regions.
    

    At some point we should also turn our attention to recent changes in the
EI Act which moved us away from counter-cyclical financing of EI. We should
set EI premium rates so that we are raising rates in upturns and reducing them
during downturns, which a 1995 federal report concluded was key to EI's role
as Canada's "single most powerful automatic stabilizer". We're failing to save
in the fat years for the lean years - which are very much upon us now.

    
    Yours truly,

    (signed)

    KEN LEWENZA
    National President
    





For further information:

For further information: John McClyment, CAW Communications, (416)
315-3202

Organization Profile

Canadian Auto Workers Union (CAW)

More on this organization


Custom Packages

Browse our custom packages or build your own to meet your unique communications needs.

Start today.

CNW Membership

Fill out a CNW membership form or contact us at 1 (877) 269-7890

Learn about CNW services

Request more information about CNW products and services or call us at 1 (877) 269-7890