But Legal Battles Could Thwart Parliament's Intent
OTTAWA, June 17, 2011 /CNW/ - A legislative gap long seen as a black
mark on Canada's human rights record will finally be closed on June 18,
2011 when, for the first time in more than 30 years, First Nations and
other Aboriginal people will have the same human rights protections as
everyone else in Canada.
This means they will be able to take action against First Nations
governments as well as the Government of Canada when they experience
discrimination in decisions affecting their daily lives.
"The Canadian Government has taken an important step toward correcting
this historic injustice," David Langtry, Acting Chief Commissioner of
the Canadian Human Rights Commission said.
"The purpose of the Canadian Human Rights Act is to ensure equality of opportunity and freedom from discrimination
for all people in Canada. The exclusion of people governed by the Indian Act from human rights law was discriminatory and contrary to democratic
principles," he said.
June 18 marks the end of a three-year transition period that delayed the
full application of Bill C-21. This law corrects the fundamental
injustice of denying people governed by the Indian Act recourse against human rights violations. Over 700,000 people, primarily
residents of First Nations communities, are affected by this change.
While C-21 was immediately applicable to the federal government,
Parliament gave First Nations governments three years to prepare to
meet their new obligations under the Canadian Human Rights Act.
On reserves, Ottawa funds health and social services that are usually
provided by provinces and territories, such as education and child
welfare. Extending the Canadian Human Rights Act to First Nations and other Aboriginal people means they can file
discrimination complaints against First Nations governments as well as
the Canadian government concerning the delivery of those services.
The exclusion of the Indian Act from the 1977 Canadian Human Rights Act under section 67 was intended to be temporary. However, attempts over
the years to repeal that section were unsuccessful. The Canadian Human
Rights Commission had repeatedly called for repeal, as did the United
When Parliament repealed section 67 in 2008, the Commission began
assisting First Nations to build awareness and develop capacity to
address human rights issues. The Commission summarized this work in a
Special Report to Parliament.
Litigation currently underway could significantly affect the impact of
including First Nations communities under the Canadian Human Rights Act.
A case currently before the Federal Court of Canada is an example. The
First Nations Child Welfare case originated with a complaint to the
Commission that federal funding for child welfare services on reserve
is inequitable and discriminatory.
The Attorney General of Canada is arguing to dismiss the case on the
grounds that the Canadian Human Rights Act does not apply to federal government funding for services to First
The Canadian Human Rights Commission is challenging this interpretation,
as it would give the federal government sweeping immunity from human
rights law while leaving First Nations governments solely accountable
for breaches of the Act.
"Report after report, notably by the Auditor General, document the
inequities of living conditions on reserve," Acting Chief Commissioner
Langtry said. "Full access to human rights protection has the potential
to be a catalyst for real, tangible, positive change," he said.
"However this could be nullified if the Attorney General succeeds in
imposing such a narrow definition on the federal government's
obligations," he said. "That would perpetuate discrimination, instead
of ending it, as Parliament intended."
Acting Chief Commissioner Langtry's June 17 News Conference from the
National Press Theatre in Ottawa can be viewed on-line on http://archive.isiglobal.ca/vod/chrc/2011-06-17.html.
Section 67 of the Canadian Human Rights Act:
Section 67 prohibited people from filing discrimination complaints about
their treatment under the Indian Act against the Government of Canada and First Nations governments.
When Parliament excluded the Indian Act from human rights law, it was meant to be a temporary measure. The
government of the day had intended to reform the Indian Act and wanted time for consultations. That was back in 1977.
In 2005 and 2008, the Canadian Human Rights Commission tabled special
reports to Parliament urging the removal of this exemption from
Canada's human rights legislation.
In June 2008, section 67 of the Canadian Human Rights Act was repealed. Parliament made the change immediately applicable to the
Government of Canada. First Nations governments were given a
three-year transition period to prepare for the change.
During the transition period, the Commission began raising awareness of
the Canadian Human Rights Act within First Nations communities. This included strengthening the
Commission's relationship with First Nations communities and providing
information to First Nations governments as they prepared for their new
Since 2008, the Commission has accepted 21 discrimination complaints
against the Government of Canada related to the Indian Act.
June 18, 2011, is the first day that the Canadian Human Rights Act will be fully applicable to First Nations governments.
As of June 18, the Commission will be able to accept complaints against
First Nations governments related to issues such as matrimonial
property, band membership, gender rights and government accountability.
Due to the Commission's awareness-building activities, many more
complaints dealing with matters not related to the Indian Act (such as the rights of people with disabilities) may also come forward.
Under the Canadian Human Rights Act, First Nations children should now have the right to the same quality of
child and family support on reserve as they would everywhere else in
Canada. Similarly, decisions about housing or about who can reside on
land can now be challenged under human rights law. The Canadian Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on age, sex, race, family status and
seven other grounds.
The Welfare of Children on Reserves
The First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada and the
Assembly of First Nations filed a complaint with the Commission. In the
complaint they stated that First Nations child welfare organizations
receive less funding than agencies serving children off reserve.
In 2009, the Commission referred the complaint to the Canadian Human
The Attorney General of Canada challenged the complaint, arguing that
the provision of funding to First Nations child welfare organizations
is not a "service" as defined in the Canadian Human Rights Act.
The Commission disagrees with the Attorney General of Canada's position.
The Commission represented the public interest before the Canadian
Human Rights Tribunal, which dismissed the complaint in March, 2011.
Given the potential impact of this case on the jurisdiction of the Canadian Human Rights Act , the Commission filed an application to Federal Court for judicial
review, effectively appealing the Tribunal's decision.
The documented impact of funding disparities on the welfare of
vulnerable children on reserves makes this a humanitarian issue of
SOURCE Canadian Human Rights Commission
For further information:
Interviews and media inquiries: